Moruneva / Toolkit

Small tools.
Useful decisions.

Practical experiments for makers, operators and creative teams. Start with an actual job, see the tool’s limits, and take the evidence back to your own workflow.

Local-first where practicalExplicit limitationsHuman decisions stay human
Available now in site source

Try an existing tool

↗
Workflow evidence / free

Outcome Reconciler

Compare execution, receipt and expected-event CSVs. Spot gaps or shared IDs without claiming an actual business outcome was verified.

Open the checker →
◎
Handoff / free

Client Handoff Checklist

A lightweight, browser-local checklist for clarifying a delivery scope and unanswered acceptance questions.

Open checklist →
≋
Acceptance / free

Scope to Acceptance

Turn a project scope into structured questions for review. Output is a starting point, not a signed approval.

Explore tool →
✉
Communication / free experiment

Before You Send

Check a work message for its audience, next step, owner, deadline and evidence. Local-first, with a human route decision and downloadable intent packet.

Check a message →
Research and prototypes

Where we're exploring

AI operations

Cost ≠ outcome

Compare AI task-level spend with what a task actually achieved. An experiment in a GitHub draft, not yet a live service.

Read the approach →
Creator workflows

Audio rights evidence

Keep voiceover and music generation-plan evidence legible without pretending a checklist grants commercial rights. Draft experiment.

Read the approach →
3D / video production

Scene to shot handoff

Identify missing metadata, mismatched versions and uncertain creative approvals. Prototype only; creator remains the decision maker.

Read the approach →
How we build

Not every experiment should become a product.

We publish useful methods, build narrowly scoped tools and test them against existing alternatives. We label what was simulated, what was genuinely observed and what remains unknown.

Explore the journal →